In my last post, I discussed divine
inspiration, revelation and Biblical errancy.
Now I propose a somewhat odd simile.
Think of divine inspiration as the crucial information which various
witnesses have been given. Revelation is
the testimony the witnesses give at the trial. The stenographer
corresponds in this simile to the scribe taking dictation from a Biblical
author.
The value of this simile is that it makes it
clear that everything depends on the testimony; nobody in his right mind would
imagine that the stenographer can have anything but one role to play: to get things straight. He does not add his own remarks to the
testimony. His only value lies in staying
out of the way. Any value his transcript has is due exclusively to its
fidelity to the court proceedings.
Is there any corroboration for this unusual
comparison?
St. Clement’s epistle to the Corinthians might do.1 We note that this epistle, which was written towards
the end of the 1st century, contains numerous citations of the Old
Testament.
St. Clement uses several expressions to quote the Old
Testament: “it is written,” “that which
was written,” “it says” etc. Most of his
citations use these kinds of standard expressions. He also says “the Scripture bears witness”
(XXIII.5) and “Scripture says” (XXXIV.6 and XLII.5), expressions which seem to
support the court-room simile proposed above.
Other times he introduces quotes in a very different
way. E.g., he introduces a quote from
Gen. 2.23 (“This is now bone of my bone etc.”) in VI.3 as “the saying of our
father Adam”. He also introduces a quote
from Ez. (33.11-27) by saying that “the Master of all things spoke.”
St. Clement often introduces a quote with “God says”
(VIII.4, X.2, XIV.5, XVIII.1 etc.; cf. XXXII.2, XXXIII.5). In XIII.1, of Jer.
9.23-24, St. Clement says, “the Holy Spirit says.” In XXII.1, he introduces an Old Testament
citation of Ps. 33:12 (LXX) by saying that “Christ . . . himself through his
Holy Spirit calls us thus.” Introducing
a quote of Ps. 2.7-8, he says, “But of his Son the Master said thus: ‘Thou art my son etc.’”(XXXVI.4).
To wrap it up:
in addition to standard ways of citing Scripture, St. Clement also likes
to refer to speakers, not just documents.
Next time we will draw a few inferences from this
fact.
ENDNOTES FOR THE CURIOUS
1. The Apostolic Fathers is what we call
the earliest fathers after the apostles.
The proper term is sub-apostolic,
where sub- means immediately adjacent (The Concise Oxford Dictionary). The earliest were contemporaries of St. John
the Theologian. There are several
collections of their writings of the Apostolic Fathers in print and
online. The online versions tend to be
done in archaic English; the best version online may be J. B. Lightfoot’s.
No comments:
Post a Comment